Search

Powering the Future Safely: An In-Depth Dive into Nuclear Innovation Compliance

Powering the Future Safely: An In-Depth Dive into Nuclear Innovation Compliance

A Client was in the process of commissioning a new machine assembly (supplied by third party) intended to be used for the size reduction of laboratory gloveboxes previously used to handle radioactive material. The system uses a Class 1 Laser to cut off sections of the glovebox and then deposit the cut sections into a container for further processing.

Project Summary

Sector

Capabilities

Service

During the commissioning process concerns were raised by the end user regarding the reliability of the safety functionality incorporated into the system and the accuracy/detail of the risk assessment used in the design.

Finch was requested to review the technical file, advising on the machine’s compliance to current legislation and the use of the relevant standards which included, but not limited to:

  • BS EN 11553 series – Safety of Machinery – Laser processing machines.
  • BS EN ISO 12100:2010 Safety of Machinery – General principles for design. Risk assessment and risk reduction.
  • BS EN ISO 13849 (parts 1 & 2) Safety of Machinery – Safety related parts of control systems.
  • BS EN ISO 13850:2015. Safety of Machinery – Emergency Stop Function – Principles for Design.

Challenges

Finch conducted an assessment detailing the requirements to aid all stakeholders with understanding their responsibilities under Directive 2006/42/EC (Machinery Directive – MD) and Directive 204/30/EU (Electromagnetic Compatibility – EMC).

Finch identified the relevant Harmonised Standards and reviewed the Technical File with a view of incorporating the requirements of the ‘Standards’ to meet the EHSR’s and ER’s.

A report was produced that evaluated the machines design, the content of the technical file and the capability of the technical file to meet the compliance objectives and achieve ‘best practice.’

The report produced identified challenges including:

  • Absence of documentation within the technical file
  • Lack of detail in identifying and specifying the safety requirements
  • The presence of ‘fault masking’ within the safety system electrical design

Finch was requested to provide solutions to these challenges, which led Finch to:

  • Produce a machinery design risk assessment – identifying the requirements of the safety related parts of the control system.
  • Produce a Safety Requirements Specification – detailing the functional requirements of the safety system and reliability to BS EN ISO 13849-1:2015.
  • Propose changes to the wiring to remove the fault masking.
  • Provide verification of the functional safety design (using SISTEMA software)

Conclusion

Finch was able to inform and provide the client with the tools needed to ensure they were supplying a safe and reliable system protecting the integrity of the system and the safety of the end users’ assets.

Finch were able to identify and assist in the production of the technical file elements that were absent, enabling the manufacturer to comply with the relevant directives and standards.

“Your work was vital and allowed us to get to this position so thanks again, and for the next one we'll be in touch to make sure we start off the project on the right heading.”

Robert Marwood – Atkins Realis

If you need assistance with something similar, or guidance prior to embarking on the supply of equipment to the nuclear industry, please don’t hesitate to contact [email protected]

“Compliance starts at concept and aids in the design development. It does not need to be a costly afterthought.”

Jim Creswell – Finch Consulting

Related case studies