Search

Navigating the Future: Ensuring Safety in the Age of Automated Vehicles in Warehouses

Navigating the Future: Ensuring Safety in the Age of Automated Vehicles in Warehouses

In the ever-evolving workplace, more and more companies are looking at utilising automation in their processes.

Posted

11.02.2025

Written by

EUR ING Paul Wood

One area of increased adoption is the use of automated machinery in warehouse areas. Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) and Autonomous Mobile Robot (AMR) are the most commonly used descriptions for this sort of equipment. Whilst similar, they are different but both present hazards which the supplier and end users need to be aware of and take into consideration when installing such equipment.

AGV’s are robots which follow fixed paths or tracks and normally require wires or magnetic tapes installed on the floor to mark out the paths. This provides defined and predictable paths of movement.

AMR’s are robots which operate (as the name suggests) autonomously, with no fixed paths and are able to navigate uncontrolled environments. Whilst operating in pre-defined areas it means that their movements aren’t fully predictable.

The use of either of these technologies will normally involve installation in an existing operational area likely involving access by pedestrians. Whilst the robots are fitted with various sensors to control their operation safely, consideration is required to reduce the pedestrian/vehicle interface wherever possible.

The installation of this sort of equipment should involve a Machinery Risk Assessment in accordance with the requirements of the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008 but the pedestrian/vehicle interface should also form part of a Workplace Transport Assessment in accordance with the guidance provided by The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 whilst also fulfilling the duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

Where pedestrian/vehicle segregation control measures become more difficult to implement is often around the interface points between operator and robot areas e.g. where a pallet of product is picked up or offloaded. How pedestrian access for foreseeable interventions is managed in these mixed-use areas is key to a safe working environment (e.g. for maintenance, fault finding or clearing obstructions etc.).

As with lots of machinery on the market there are ISO standards aimed at providing guidance on how to safely implement this sort of technology but following the correct methodology is key to a successful and safe deployment. This is particularly important where robot systems are integrated along with other equipment which can create new hazards in addition to those foreseeable issues identified as part of the robot manufacturers original design risk assessment process. This highlights the importance of assessing an installation on a case-by-case basis so that the necessary controls can be put in place to suit the unique environment of each installation.

Finch has the required knowledge and experience of how best to approach these sorts of projects, the hazards they present and the most pragmatic ways of managing them to ensure the return on investment is achieved, the benefits realised, and (most importantly) a safe workplace remains in operation.

Related insights